World(s)-Making through Data Work, Activism, and More-than-Human Encounters

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2038-3460/26304

Keywords:

caring, commoning, more-than-human relations, digital infrastructures, scholar-activism

Abstract

This Crossing Boundaries section hosts thought-provoking contributions in which scholars reflect on their situated engagements with commoning and caring. The authors examine how they try navigating the tensions, synergies, overlaps, and ruptures between their research agendas and the knowledge politics of the commons and care across digital infrastructures, grassroots activism, and more-than-human relations. Yana Boeva explores how caring and commoning are not only theoretical frameworks for understanding digital technologies, but also deeply entangled practices, often entailing voluntary or precarious labor, that are essential to technology. This framework highlights the tensions shaping these practices, from exploitative care work to exclusions tied to expertise and power in digital commons. Cindy Kohtala reflects on scholar-activism within grassroots technology milieus, arguing that both design and STS scholarship inhabit the so-called ivory tower and the world beyond academia, and therefore engage in forms of “edgework”. Finally, Jonas Fritsch offers an autoethnographic account of affective and more-than-human encounters at the margins of research, reflecting on how long-term engagement with urban ecologies generates careful world-making that blurs the boundaries between research, everyday life, and ethical commitment.

References

Akama, Yoko (2014) Attuning to Ma (between-ness) in designing, in “PDC ’14 – Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts, Volume 2”, New York, October 6-10, pp. 21-24.

Andrejevic, Mark, Fordyce, Robbie, Li, Luzhou and Trott, Verity (2023) Automated culture: Introduction, in “Cultural Studies”, 37(1), pp. 1-19.

Barbrook, Richard and Cameron, Andy (1996) The Californian ideology, in “Science as Culture”, 6(1), pp. 44-72.

Baudry, Jérôme, Tancoigne, Élise and Strasser, Bruno J. (2021) Turning crowds into communities: The collectives of online citizen science, in “Social Studies of Science”, 52(3), pp. 399-424.

Berglund, Eeva and Kohtala, Cindy (2020) Collaborative Confusion among DIY Makers: Ethnography and Expertise in Creating Knowledge for Environmental Sustainability, in “Science & Technology Studies”, 33(2), pp. 102-119.

Berlant, Lauren (2016) The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times*, in “Environment and Planning D: Society and Space”, 34(3), pp. 393-419.

Berry, David M. and Moss, Giles (2006, September) The politics of the libre commons, in “First Monday”, 11(9). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/berry/index.html.

Birch, Kean and Cochrane, D. T. (2022) Big Tech: Four Emerging Forms of Digital Rentiership, in “Science as Culture”, 31(1), pp. 44-58.

Boeva, Yana and Foster, Ellen K. (2016) Making: On Being and Becoming Expert, in “Interaction Design and Architecture(s)”, 30, pp. 65-74.

Boeva, Yana and Kropp, Cordula (2024) Buildings in the Algorithmic Regime: Infrastructuring Processes in Computational Design, in Juliane Jarke, Bianca Prietl, Simon Egbert, Yana Boeva, Hendrik Heuer and Maike Arnold (eds.), Algorithmic Regimes: Methods, Interactions, and Politics, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 141-162.

Bollier, David and Helfrich, Silke (eds.) (2012) The Wealth of the Commons: A World beyond Market & State, Amherst (MA), Levellers Press.

Bowker, Geoffrey C. (1993) How to Be Universal: Some Cybernetic Strategies, 1943-70, in “Social Studies of Science”, 23(1), pp. 107-127.

Bowker, Geoffrey C., Baker, Karen, Millerand, Florence and Ribes, David (2009) Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment, in Jeremy Hunsinger, Lisbeth Klastrup and Matthew Allen (eds.), International Handbook of Internet Research, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp. 97-117.

Brereton, Margot, Roe, Paul, Schroeter, Ronald and Lee Hong, Anita (2014) Beyond ethnography: Engagement and reciprocity as foundations for design research out here, in “CHI ‘14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems”, Toronto, April 26-May 1, pp. 1183-1186.

Bucher, Taina (2018) If… Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics, New York, Oxford University Press.

Burrell, Jenna and Fourcade, Marion (2021) The Society of Algorithms, in “Annual Review of Sociology”, 47(1), pp. 213-237.

Carson, Kevin A. (2021) Exodus: General Idea of the Revolution in the XXI Century, Tulsa, Center for a Stateless Society.

Coles, Romand (2016) Visionary Pragmatism: Radical and Ecological Democracy in Neoliberal Times, Durham, Duke University Press.

Costanza-Chock, Sasha (2020) Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Daly, Angela, Leeming, Gary, Nanni, Riccardo and O’Neil, Mathieu (2024, October 14) Incorporating digital commons into government policies: An introduction to the Digital Commons Policy Council’s Best Practices guide. NCACE (National Centre for Academic and Cultural Exchange). Available at: https://ncace.ac.uk/2024/10/14/incorporating-digital-commons-into-government-policies-an-introduction-to-the-digital-commons-policy-councils-best-practices-guide/ (retrieved March 5, 2026).

Dannemann, Hauke (2023) Experiments of authoritarian sustainability: Völkisch settlers and far-right prefiguration of a climate behemoth, in “Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy”, 19(1), 2175468.

Davies, Sarah R. and Holmer, Constantin (2024) Care, collaboration, and service in academic data work: Biocuration as “academia otherwise”, in “Information, Communication & Society”, 27(4), pp. 683-701.

Delfanti, Alessandro and Frey, Bronwyn (2021) Humanly Extended Automation or the Future of Work Seen through Amazon Patents, in “Science, Technology, & Human Values”, 46(3), pp. 655-682.

Dourish, Paul (2016) Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context, in “Big Data & Society”, 3(2).

Downey, Gary Lee and Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun (eds.) (2021) Making & Doing: Activating STS through Knowledge Expression and Travel, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Dulong De Rosnay, Mélanie (2020) Commonswashing – A Political Communication Struggle, in “Global Cooperation Research – A Quarterly Magazine”, 2(3), pp. 11-13.

Dulong De Rosnay, Mélanie and Musiani, Francesca (2016) Towards a (de) centralisation-based typology of peer production, in “TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique”, 14(1), pp. 189-207.

Dulong De Rosnay, Mélanie and Stalder, Felix (2020) Digital commons, in “Internet Policy Review”, 9(4).

Dunbar-Hester, Christina (2019) If “Diversity” Is the Answer, What Is the Question? Understanding Diversity Advocacy in Voluntaristic Technology Projects, in Janet Vertesi and David Ribes (eds.), digitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press, pp. 81-98.

D’Ignazio, Catherine and Klein, Lauren F. (2020) Data feminism, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Edwards, Paul N. (2010) A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Edwards, Paul N., Mayernik, Matthew S., Batcheller, Archer L., Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Borgman, Christine L. (2011) Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration, in “Social Studies of Science”, 41(5), pp. 667-690.

Eriksson, Eva, Ludvigsen, Martin, Lykke-Olesen, Andreas and Nielsen, Rune (2006) Bthere or Be Square: A Method for Extreme Contextualization of Design, in “Proceedings of Wonderground 2006 Design Conference”, Lisbon, Portugal, November 1-4.

Escobar, Arturo (2018) Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, Durham, Duke University Press.

Eubanks, Philip and Schaeffer, John D. (2008) A Kind Word for Bullshit: The Problem of Academic Writing, in “College Composition and Communication”, 59(3), pp. 372-388.

European Commission (2026, January 6) Towards European Open Digital Ecosystems [Call for Evidence – Ares(2026)69111]. European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/16213-European-Open-Digital-Ecosystems_en (retrieved April 6, 2026).

Forlano, Laura, Hannah, Dehlia, Jungnickel, Kat, McHardy, Julien and Rogers, Hannah Star (2012) Experiments in (and out of) the Studio: Art and Design Methods for Science and Technology Studies, Pre-EASST/4S Workshop.

Fritsch, Jonas (2018) Affective Interaction Design at the End of the World, in “Proceedings of the Design Research Society (DRS) Conference”, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 896-908.

Fritsch, Jonas (2019) An Eco-logic of Urban Interactive Environments, in Erin Manning, Anna Munster and Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen (eds.), Immediations II, London, Open Humanities Press, pp. 477-488.

Fritsch, Jonas (2021) Problematizing Affective Interaction Design, in Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen, Jette Kofoed and Jonas Fritsch (eds.), Affects, Interfaces, Events, Lancaster and Vancouver, Imbricate! Press, pp. 17-38.

Fritsch, Jonas (2025) Sticking with Affect in HCI and Design: From Interaction to Relation, in “AAR ’25 – Proceedings of the sixth decennial Aarhus conference: Computing X Crisis”, Aarhus, Denmark, New York, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 202-215.

Fritsch, Jonas, Saad-Sulonen, Joanna and Poderi, Giacomo (2022) The Problem(s) of Caring for the Commons, in “NordiCHI ’22 – Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference”, Aarhus, Denmark, New York, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1-9.

Fritsch, Jonas and Samson, Kristine (2020) An Eco-Logic of Change: The need for an Affective Re-valuation of Urban Space, in “Geoforum Perspektiv”, 19(35), pp. 15-25.

Fritsch, Jonas and Thomsen, Bodil Marie Stavning (2014) An Ethology of Urban Fabric(s), in “APRJA – A Peer-Reviewed Journal About”, 3(1), pp. 96-105.

Gebru, Timnit and Torres, Émile P. (2024) The TESCREAL bundle: Eugenics and the promise of utopia through artificial general intelligence, in “First Monday”, 29(4).

Gehl, Robert W. (2025) Move Slowly and Build Bridges: Mastodon, the Fediverse, and the Struggle for Democratic Social Media, Oxford (UK), Oxford University Press.

Gitelman, Lisa (2013) “Raw data” is an oxymoron, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Graeber, David (2018) Bullshit Jobs: A Theory, New York, Simon & Schuster.

Guattari, Félix (1989) The Three Ecologies, London, Continuum.

Gül, Zeynel, Harb, Jenna Imad, Shaik Ali, Misria and Pandian, Sharad (2025) Doing STS Now: Of Hackers and Angels in Technoscience, in “Science, Technology, & Human Values”, 50(1), pp. 3-11.

Haraway, Donna (1994) A Game of Cat’s Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies, in “Configurations”, 1, pp. 59-71.

Haraway, Donna (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, Duke University Press.

Helmond, Anne (2015) The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready, in “Social Media + Society”, 1(2).

Hess, David J. (2016) Undone Science: Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Hoeyer, Klaus, Bauer, Susanne and Pickersgill, Martyn (2019) Datafication and accountability in public health: Introduction to a special issue, in “Social Studies of Science”, 49(4), pp. 459-475.

Houtbeckers, Eeva (2025) Working the insider-outsider hyphen in action research for sustainability: Tensions in citizen-led multi-stakeholder forest dialogues, in “IJAR: International Journal of Action Research”, 21(1), pp. 24-42.

Illich, Ivan (1973) Tools for Conviviality, New York, Harper and Row.

Irani, Lilly (2015) Difference and Dependence among Digital Workers: The Case of Amazon Mechanical Turk, in “South Atlantic Quarterly”, 114(1), pp. 225-234.

Jarke, Juliane, Prietl, Bianca, Egbert, Simon, Boeva, Yana and Heuer, Hendrik (2024) Knowing in Algorithmic Regimes: An Introduction, in Juliane Jarke, Bianca Prietl, Simon Egbert, Yana Boeva, Hendrik Heuer and Maike Arnold (eds.), Algorithmic Regimes: Methods, Interactions, and Politics, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 7-34.

Jowsey, Tanisha, Braun, Virginia, Clarke, Victoria, Lupton, Deborah and Fine, Michelle (2025) We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research, in “Qualitative Inquiry”, 10778004251401851, online first.

Kaun, Anne and Liminga, Agnes (2025) Welfare service centers: Maintenance, repair, and care at the analog interfaces of the digital welfare state, in “New Media & Society”, 27(5), pp. 3039-3054.

Kelty, Christopher M. (2008) Two bits: The cultural significance of free software, Durham, Duke University Press.

Kelty, Christopher M. (2017) Too Much Democracy in All the Wrong Places: Toward a Grammar of Participation, in “Current Anthropology”, 58(S15), pp. S77-S90.

Kofoed, Jette (2024) Academic Habitats? An Essay on Research Ethics, in “Conjunctions: Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation”, 10(1), pp. 1-14.

Kofoed, Jette and Fritsch, Jonas (2023) Affective Event Writing: An Entry Point for Collective Attunement, in “Capacious: Journal for Emerging Affect Inquiry”, 3(1), pp. 225-240.

Kohtala, Cindy (2018) The Sociomateriality of FabLabs: Configurations of a Printing Service or Counter-Context?, in “Journal of Peer Production”, 1(12), pp. 92-110.

Kohtala, Cindy, Walls, Jedediah and We-Left Collective (2019) Designing Care and Commoning into a Code of Conduct, in Tuuli Mattelmäki, Ramia Mazé, Satu Miettinen and Namkyu Chun (eds.), Who Cares? Proceedings of the 8th Bi-Annual Nordic Design Research Society Conference, Otaniemi, June 2-4, pp. 1-5.

Kuu-Park, Goeun, Botero, Andrea, Kohtala, Cindy and Moradi Zavie Kordc, Soroush (2026) Seamful infrastructuring through material engagement for energy transitions with youth, in “CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts”, pp. 1-21.

Lange, Bastian and Bürkner, Hans-Joachim (2018) Open workshops as sites of innovative socio-economic practices: Approaching urban post-growth by assemblage theory, in “Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability”, 23(7), pp. 680-696.

Law, John (2015) What’s wrong with a one-world world?, in “Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory”, 16(1), pp. 126-139.

Lee, Francis and Ribes, David (2025) Computational universalism, or, Attending to relationalities at scale, in “Social Studies of Science”, 56(3), pp. 325-339.

Lin, Cindy (2025) Knowing Nature Through Data, in Tommaso Venturini, Amelia Acker, Jean-Christophe Plantin and Tone Walford (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Data and Society, Thousand Oaks, Sage, pp. 207-230.

Lindén, Lisa and Lydahl, Doris (2021) Editorial: Care in STS, in “Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies”, 9(1), pp. 3-12.

Loukissas, Yanni A. (2019) All data are local: Thinking critically in a data-driven society, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Marres, Noortje (2015) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics, Houndmills and New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Massumi, Brian (2009) On Microperception and Micropolitics [Interview], in “Inflexions: A Journal for Research-Creation”, 3, pp. 1-20.

McKibben, Bill (2022, September 8) How Bad Is It? And what does that question even mean?. The Crucial Years [Substack]. Available at: https://billmckibben.substack.com/p/how-bad-is-it (retrieved April 6, 2026).

Miceli, Milagros and Posada, Julian (2022) The Data-Production Dispositif, in “Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction”, 6(CSCW2), pp. 1-37.

Mol, Annemarie, Moser, Ingunn and Pols, Jeannette (eds.) (2010) Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, Bielefeld, transcript.

Moore, Niamh, Dunne, Nikki, Karels, Martina and Hanlon, Mary (2021) Towards an Inventive Ethics of Carefull Risk: Unsettling Research Through DIY Academic Archiving, in “Australian Feminist Studies”, 36(108), pp. 180-199.

Murillo, Luis Felipe R. (2025) Common Circuits: Hacking Alternative Technological Futures, Redwood City, Stanford University Press.

Musiani, Francesca (2012) Caring about the plumbing: On the importance of architectures in social studies of (peer-to-peer) Technology, in “Journal of Peer Production”, 1. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-00771863v1.

Noroozian, Arman, Aldana, Lorena, Arisi, Marta, Asghari, Hadi, Avila, Renata, Bizzaro, Pietro, Chandrasekhar, Ramya, Consonni, Cristian, De Angelis, Deborah, De Chiara, Francesca, del Rio-Chanona, Maria, Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie, Eriksson, Maria, Font, Frederic, Gomez, Emilia, Guillier, Valérian, Gutermuth, Lisa, Hartmann, David, Kaffee, Lucie-Aimée, Keller, Paul, Stadler, Felix, Vinagre, Joao, Vrandečić, Denny and Wasielewski, Amanda (2025) Generative AI and the Future of the Digital Commons: Five Open Questions and Knowledge Gaps, in “arXiv”. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.06470.

Oliveiros, Pauline (2022) Quantum Listening, London, Ignota Books.

Olsson, Per, Moore, Michele-Lee, Westley, Frances R. and McCarthy, Daniel D. P. (2017) The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: A new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability, in “Ecology and Society”, 22(2).

O’Neil, Mathieu, Pentzold, Christian and Toupin, Sophie (eds.) (2020) The handbook of peer production, Hoboken, Wiley Blackwell.

Papadopoulos, Dimitris (2018) Experimental Practice: Technoscience, Alterontologies, and More-Than-Social Movements, Durham, Duke University Press.

Paulson, Susan (2024) World-making technology entangled with coloniality, race and gender: Ecomodernist and degrowth perspectives, in “Environmental Values”, 33(1), pp. 71-89.

Pereira, Maria do Mar (2016) Struggling within and beyond the Performative University: Articulating activism and work in an “academia without walls”, in “Women’s Studies International Forum”, 54, pp. 100-110.

Perperidis, Giannis and Tsekeris, Charalambos (2026) Imagining techno-political alternatives: The (digital) commons as a response to tech oligarchies, in “Science as Culture”, pp. 1-15.

Pfaffenberger, Bryan (1992) Technological Dramas, in “Science, Technology, & Human Values”, 17(3), pp. 282-312.

Pierucci, Federico (2025) Sovereignty in the Digital Era: Rethinking Territoriality and Governance in Cyberspace, in “Digital Society”, 4(1), pp. 1-19.

Pignarre, Philippe and Stengers, Isabelle (2013) Capitalist Sorcery: Breaking the Spell (translated by Andrew Goffey), New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Pinch, Trevor J. and Bijker, Wiebe E. (1984) The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other, in “Social Studies of Science”, 14(3), pp. 399-441.

Pink, Sarah, Ruckenstein, Minna, Willim, Robert and Duque, Melisa (2018) Broken data: Conceptualising data in an emerging world, in “Big Data & Society”, 5(1).

Plantin, Jean-Christophe (2019) Data Cleaners for Pristine Datasets: Visibility and Invisibility of Data Processors in Social Science, in “Science, Technology, & Human Values”, 44(1), pp. 52-73.

Plantin, Jean-Christophe, Lagoze, Carl, Edwards, Paul N. and Sandvig, Christian (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook, in “New Media & Society”, 20(1), pp. 293-310.

Poderi, Giacomo (2020) The subjects of/in commoning and the affective dimension of infrastructuring the commons, in “Journal of Peer Production”, 14, pp. 30-44.

Poderi, Giacomo (2020) The subjects of/in commoning and the affective dimension of infrastructuring the commons, in “Journal of Peer Production”, 14, pp. 30-44.

Poirier, Lindsay (2024) Enacting data context: Fixing meaning in transparency data initiatives, in “Big Data & Society”, 11(3).

Powell, Alison B., Ustek-Spilda, Funda, Lehuedé, Sebastián and Shklovski, Irina (2022) Addressing ethical gaps in “Technology for Good”: Foregrounding care and capabilities, in “Big Data & Society”, 9(2).

Prendeville, Sharon and Kohtala, Cindy (2023) From Rhetoric to Realpolitik: The Optimism of Design Commons Discourse, in Christine Schranz (ed.), Commons in Design, Amsterdam, Valiz, pp. 181-200.

Pritchard, Helen, Gabrys, Jennifer and Houston, Laura (2018) Re-calibrating DIY: Testing digital participation across dust sensors, fry pans and environmental pollution, in “New Media & Society”, 20(12), pp. 4533-4552.

Puig de la Bellacasa, María (2012) “Nothing Comes Without Its World”: Thinking with Care, in “The Sociological Review”, 60(2), pp. 197-216.

Puig de la Bellacasa, María (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

Redden, Joanna (2018) Democratic governance in an age of datafication: Lessons from mapping government discourses and practices, in “Big Data & Society”, 5(2).

Rieder, Bernhard (2022) Towards a political economy of technical systems: The case of Google, in “Big Data & Society”, 9(2).

rms-open-letter (2021) An open letter to remove Richard M. Stallman from all leadership positions. rms-open-letter.github.io [Github repository]. Available at: https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/blob/main/index.md (retrieved April 6, 2026).

Rojas, Alejandro A., Vera, Lourdes, Hansen, Steve, Nost, Eric, Wylie, Sara, Alder, Cole and Environmental Data & Governance Iniative EDGI (2025) Infrastructuring Care: Co-Designing Computational Notebooks for Environmental Data Justice, in “Science, Technology, & Human Values”, online first.

Roy, Arundhati (2003) War Talk, Cambridge (MA), South End Press.

Savransky, Martin (2025) Interstitial Politics: Thinking in Catastrophic Times, in “Science, Technology, & Human Values”, 50(6), pp. 1115-1139.

Schlosberg, David (2025) From postmaterialism to sustainable materialism: The environmental politics of practice-based movements, in “Environmental Politics”, 34(1), pp. 92-112.

Schön, Donald A. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Sciannamblo, Mariacristina, Teli, Maurizio, Lyle, Peter and Csíkszentmihályi, Christopher (2020) Infrastructuring the Commons Today, when STS Meets ICT, in “Journal of Peer Production”, 14, pp. 1-3.

Seaver, Nick (2021) Care and Scale: Decorrelative Ethics in Algorithmic Recommendation, in “Cultural Anthropology”, 36(3), pp. 509-537.

Seyfang, Gill and Smith, Adrian (2007) Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda, in “Environmental Politics”, 16(4), pp. 584-603.

Singh, Neera (2017) Becoming a commoner: The commons as sites for affective socio-nature encounters and co-becomings, in “Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization”, 17(4), pp. 751-776.

Sismondo, Sergio (2008) Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program, in Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch and Judy Wajcman (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge (MA) and London, MIT Press, pp. 13-31.

Sivek, Susan Currie (2011) “We Need a Showing of All Hands”: Technological Utopianism in MAKE Magazine, in “Journal of Communication Inquiry”, 35(3), pp. 187-209.

Smith, Thomas S. J. (2020) “Stand back and watch us”: Post-capitalist practices in the maker movement, in “Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space”, 52(3), pp. 593-610.

Springer, Simon (2016) Fuck Neoliberalism, in “ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies”, 15(2), pp. 285-292.

Springgay, Stephanie and Truman, Sarah E. (2018) Walking Methodologies in a More-than-human World: WalkingLab, Abingdon and New York, Routledge.

Srigley, Ron (2018, February 22) Whose University Is It Anyway?. Los Angeles Review of Books. Available at: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/whose-university-is-it-anyway/ (retrieved April 6, 2026).

Star, Susan Leigh (1991) Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions, in John Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London, Routledge, pp. 26-56.

Star, Susan Leigh and Strauss, Anselm (1999) Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work, in “Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)”, 8(1-2), pp. 9-30.

Stengers, Isabelle (2019) Putting Problematization to the Test of Our Present, in “Theory, Culture and Society”, 38(2), pp. 71-92.

Stern, Daniel (1985) The Interpersonal World of the Infant, New York, Basic Book.

Suchman, Lucy (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press.

Suchman, Lucy (2023) Imaginaries of omniscience: Automating intelligence in the US Department of Defense, in “Social Studies of Science”, 53(5), pp. 761-786.

Söderberg, Johan (2010) Misuser inventions and the invention of the misuser: Hackers, crackers and filesharers, in “Science as Culture”, 19(2), pp. 151-179.

Tarr, Dominic, Lavoie, Erick, Meyer, Aljoscha and Tschudin, Christian (2019) Secure Scuttlebutt: An Identity-Centric Protocol for Subjective and Decentralized Applications, in “ICN ’19 – Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Information-Centric Networking”, New York, September 24-26, pp. 1-11.

Temper, Leah, Walter, Mariana, Rodriguez, Iokiñe, Kothari, Ashish and Turhan, Ethemcan (2018) A perspective on radical transformations to sustainability: Resistances, movements and alternatives, in “Sustainability Science”, 13(3), pp. 747-764.

Thrift, Nigel (2025) Here’s another nice mess you’ve gotten us into, in “Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers”, 51(1), e12747.

Thylstrup, Nanna B., Hansen, Kristian B., Flyverbom, Mikkel and Amoore, Louise (2022) Politics of data reuse in machine learning systems: Theorizing reuse entanglements, in “Big Data & Society”, 9(2).

Toupin, Sophie (2020) Feminist Peer Production, in Mathieu O’Neil, Christian Pentzold and Sophie Toupin (eds.), The Handbook of Peer Production, Hoboken, Wiley Blackwell, pp. 311-332.

Troncoso, Stacco and Utratel, Ann Marie (n.d.) If I Only had a Heart: A DisCO Manifesto – Value Sovereignty, Care Work, Commons and Distributed Cooperative Organizations, DisCO.coop, Transnational Institute and Guerrilla Media Collective. Available at: https://manifesto.disco.coop/.

Tsing, Anna (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press.

Tubaro, Paola, Le Ludec, Clément and Casilli, Antonio A. (2020) Counting “micro-workers”: Societal and methodological challenges around new forms of labour, in “Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation”, 14(1), pp. 67-82.

Urzedo, Danilo, Westerlaken, Michelle and Gabrys, Jennifer (2023) Digitalizing forest landscape restoration: A social and political analysis of emerging technological practices, in “Environmental Politics”, 32(3), pp. 485-510.

Varvarousis, Angelos (2019) Crisis, liminality and the decolonization of the social imaginary, in “Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space”, 2(3), pp. 493-512.

Velicu, Irina and García-López, Gustavo (2018) Thinking the Commons through Ostrom and Butler: Boundedness and Vulnerability, in “Theory, Culture & Society”, 35(6), pp. 55-73.

Velkova, Julia (2016) Open cultural production and the online gift economy: The case of Blender, in “First Monday”, 21(10).

Vetter, Andrea and Fersterer, Matthias (2025) Conviviality and Commoning, in Anitra Nelson (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Degrowth, London, Routledge, pp. 181-195.

Wajcman, Judy (2017) Automation: Is it really different this time?, in “The British Journal of Sociology”, 68(1), pp. 119-127.

Walker, Dawn (2020) Designing for Social Transformation with Alternative Infrastructures, in “CSCW ’20 Companion – Companion Publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing”, New York, October 17-21, pp. 171-175.

Widder, David G., West, Sarah and Whittaker, Meredith (2023) Open (For Business): Big Tech, Concentrated Power, and the Political Economy of Open AI, accepted to appear in “Nature”. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4543807.

Winner, Langdon (1980) Do Artifacts Have Politics?, in “Daedalus”, 109(1), pp. 121-136.

Wright, Erik Olin (2010) Envisioning Real Utopias, London and New York, Verso.

Zakharova, Irina and Jarke, Juliane (2024) Care-ful data studies: Or, what do we see, when we look at datafied societies through the lens of care?, in “Information, Communication & Society”, 27(4), pp. 651-664.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Boeva, Y., Fritsch, J., & Kohtala, C. (2026). World(s)-Making through Data Work, Activism, and More-than-Human Encounters. Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 17(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2038-3460/26304

Issue

Section

Crossing Boundaries