Maintain-ability: On Life Alongside Computer Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2038-3460/18405Keywords:
software studies, software, infrastructure, maintenance, care, lifeAbstract
This paper examines what lessons can we learn about living with technology from software maintainers who struggle to keep digital infrastructures – at least most of the time – in good running order. The empirical material of the research was collected at three events as programmers convened to give testimony of disruptions of code and life. Inspired by hyphenation of response-ability by feminist technoscience theorists Karen Barad (2007) and Donna Haraway (2016), and in response to invitation for broken world thinking by Steven Jackson (2014), I theorise the concept of maintain-ability and demonstrate its application to foreground the capacity to not only give but also receive care which holds together more-than-human worlds at the dawn of the third millennium. The findings nuance and specify the notions of maintenance documented in science and technology studies literature, and weave it into life. Software maintainers exercise considerable agency over the material in their immediate care: code. However, in doing so they also find themselves having to articulate dynamic, interdependent and hybrid networks of relations which they are intimately entangled with, and whose durability depends on the success of their ongoing, indeterminate reconfiguration. Both the programmers and the software they maintain must continuously navigate risks of breakage, burnout, bugs or falling into obsolescence.
References
Althusser, Louis (ed.) (1971) Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation), in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster, London, New Left Books, pp. 121-176.
Balsamo, Anne (2011) Designing Culture: The Technological Imagination at Work, Durham, Duke University Press.
Barad, Karen (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, Duke University Press.
Barad, Karen (2010) Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/Continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come, in “Derrida Today”, 3(2), pp. 240-268.
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong (2008) On “Sourcery,” or Code as Fetish, in “Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology”, 16(3), pp. 299-324.
Clifford, James (1983) On Ethnographic Authority, in “Representations”, 2, pp. 118-146.
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt (2016) Convivial Decay: Entangled Lifetimes in a Geriatric Infrastructure, in “CSCW ‘16 – Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing”, New York, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1511-1523.
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt (2017) “Lifetime Issues”: Temporal Relations of Design and Maintenance, in “Continent”, R3PAIR (6.1), pp. 4-12.
Cohn, Marisa Leavitt (2019) Keeping Software Present: Software as a Timely Object for Digital STS, in Janes Vertesi and David Ribes (eds.), DigitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press, pp. 423-446.
Couture, Stéphane (2019) The Ambiguous Boundaries of Computer Source Code and Some of Its Political Consequences, in Janes Vertesi and David Ribes (eds.), DigitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press, pp. 136-156.
Deleuze, Gilles (1988) Bergsonism, New York, Zone Books.
Denis, Jérôme, Mongili, Alessandro and Pontille, David (2015) Maintenance & Repair in Science and Technology Studies, in “Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies”, 6(2), pp. 5-16.
Denis, Jérôme and Pontille, David (2019) Why Do Maintenance and Repair Matter?, in Anders Blok, Ignacio Farías and Celia Roberts (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, Abingdon-on-Thames, Routledge, pp. 283-293.
Denis, Jérôme and Pontille, David (2021) Maintenance Epistemology and Public Order: Removing Graffiti in Paris, in “Social Studies of Science”, 51(2), pp. 233-258.
Denis, Jérôme and Pontille, David (2022) Making Things Last: Maintenance and the Ontological Politics of Duration, in “EASST Conference – Politics of Technoscientific Futures”, Madrid.
Denis, Jérôme, Florentin, Daniel and Pontille, David (2023) Maintenance and Its Knowledges: Functional Exploration, Biographical Supervision, and Behavioural Examination, in “Engaging Science, Technology, and Society”, 9(3), pp. 53-70.
Douglas-Jones, Rachel and Cohn, Marisa Leavitt (eds.) (2018) GDPR: Deletion Poems. Copenhagen, ETHOS Lab. Available at: https://ethos.itu.dk/gdpr/ (retrieved July 7, 2026).
Ensmenger, Nathan (2010) Making Programming Masculine, in Thomas J. Misa (eds.), Gender Codes, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 115-141.
Ensmenger, Nathan (2014) When Good Software Goes Bad: The Surprising Durability of an Ephemeral Technology. MICE: Mistakes, Ignorance, Contingency and Error in Science and Technology. Available at: https://homes.luddy.indiana.edu/nensmeng/posts/2014/09/20/mice/ (retrieved July 7, 2026).
Erickson, Seth and Kelty, Christopher (2015) The Durability of Software, in Irina Kaldrak and Martina Leeker (eds.), There Is No Software, There Are Just Services, Lüneburg, meson press, pp. 39-56.
Haraway, Donna (1985) A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s, in “Socialist Review”, 80, pp. 7-44.
Haraway, Donna (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene [Illustrated edition], Durham, Duke University Press.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (ed.) (1910) Self-Consciousness, in The Phenomenology of Spirit. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/phba.htm (retrieved July 7, 2026).
Henke, Christopher and Sims, Benjamin (2020) Repairing Infrastructures: The Maintenance of Materiality and Power, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Hicks, Mar (2018) Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost Its Edge in Computing, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Jackson, Steven J. (2014) Rethinking Repair, in Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski and Kirsten A. Foot (eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, pp. 221-240.
Kneuper, Ralf (2017) Sixty Years of Software Development Life Cycle Models, in “IEEE Annals of the History of Computing”, 39(3), pp. 41-54.
Koskenkorva, Jaakko and Järnefelt, Eero (2016) Programmers at Work Maintaining a Ruby on Rails Application.
Latour, Bruno (1987) Technology Is Society Made Durable, in “The Sociological Review”, 38(S1), pp. 103-131.
Lindén, Lisa and Lydahl, Doris (2021) Editorial: Care in STS, in “Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies”, April, pp. 3-12 https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.4000.
Manovich, Lev (2013) Software Takes Command – Volume 5: International Texts in Critical Media Aesthetics, London, Bloomsbury Academic.
Mattern, Shannon (2018, November) Maintenance and Care. Places. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22269/181120 (retrieved July 9, 2026).
Nova, Nicolas and Bloch, Anaïs (2020) Dr. Smartphones: An Ethnography of Mobile Phone Repair Shops, Morges, IDP.
Ojala, Mace (2021) Maintain-ability: A Thesis On Life Alongside Computer Software [Master’s thesis], Tampere, Tampere University, Trepo. Available at: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202202031820.
Ojala, Mace and Cohn, Marisa Leavitt (2023) Software Maintenance as Materialization of Common Knowledge, in “Engaging Science, Technology, and Society”, 9(3), pp. 165-185.
Piredda, Giulia (2020) What Is an Affective Artifact? A Further Development in Situated Affectivity, in “Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences”, 19(3), pp. 549-567.
Pirsig, Robert (1974) Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Valeues, New York, William Morrow and Company.
Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Ruparelia, Nayan B. (2010) Software Development Lifecycle Models, in “ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes”, 35(3), pp. 8-13.
Salo, Erja. (n.d.) Raatajat rahanalaiset / Kaski. Ateneum. Available at: https://www.kansallisgalleria.fi/fi/object/392378 (retrieved November 5, 2023).
Vinsel, Lee and Russell, Andrew L. (2020) The Innovation Delusion: How Our Obsession with the New Has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most, New York, Currency.
Viola, Marco (2021) Three Varieties of Affective Artifacts: Feeling, Evaluative and Motivational Artifacts, in “Phenomenology and Mind”, 20(June), pp. 228-241.
Winthereik, Brit Ross (2020) Is ANT’s Radical Empiricism Ethnographic?, in Anders Blok, Ignacio Farias and Celia Roberts (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, London, Routledge, pp. 24-33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mace Ojala

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.